PDA

View Full Version : The USA Economic TSUNAMI -Have a Break And Digest


Muhammad
10th April 2005, 01:37 AM
The US Economic Tsunami, Sooner Than You Think

By Mike Whitney

Al-Jazeerah, April 9, 2005


“If the world's central bankers accumulate fewer dollars, the result would be an unrelenting American need to borrow in the face of an ever weaker dollar - a recipe for higher interest rates and higher prices. The economic repercussions could unfold gradually, resulting in a long, slow decline in living standards. Or there could be a quick unraveling, with the hallmarks of an uncontrolled fiscal crisis.” New York Times editorial 4-2-05

It seems that there are a growing number of people who believe as I do, that the economic tsunami planned by the Bush administration is probably only months away. In just 5 short years the national debt has increased by nearly 3 trillion dollars while the dollar has continued its predictable decline. The dollar has fallen a whopping 38% since Bush took office, due largely to the massive $450 billion per year tax cuts. At the same time, numerous laws have been passed (Patriot Act, Intelligence Reform Bill, Homeland Security Bill, National ID, Passport requirements etc) anticipating the need for greater repression when the economy takes its inevitable nosedive. Regrettably, that nosedive looks to be coming sooner rather than later.

The administration is currently putting as much pressure as possible on OPEC to ratchet up the flow of oil another 1 million barrels per day (well over capacity) to settle down nervous markets and buy time for the planned bombing of Iran in June. Like Fed Chief Alan Greenspan’s artificially low interest rates, the manipulation of oil production is a way of concealing how dire the situation really is. Rising prices at the pump signal an upcoming recession, (depression?) so the administration is pulling out all the stops to meet the short term demand and maintain the illusion that things are still okay. (Bush would rather avoid massive popular unrest until his battle-plans for Iran are carried out).

But, of course, things are not okay. The country has been intentionally plundered and will eventually wind up in the hands of its creditors as Bush and his lieutenants planned from the very beginning. Those who don’t believe this should note the methodical way that the deficits have been produced at (around) $450 billion per year; a systematic and orderly siphoning off of the nation’s future. The value of the dollar and the increasing national debt follow exactly the same (deliberate) downward trajectory.

This same Ponzi scheme has been carried out repeatedly by the IMF and World Bank throughout the world; Argentina being the last dramatic illustration. (Argentina’s economic collapse occurred when its trade deficit was running at 4%; right now ours is at an unprecedented 6%.) Bankruptcy is a fairly straight forward way of delivering valuable public assets and resources to collaborative industries, and of annihilating national sovereignty. After a nation is successfully driven to destitution, public policy decisions are made by creditors and not by representatives of the people. (Enter, Paul Wolfowitz).

Did Americans really believe they could avoid a similar fate? If so, they’d better forget about it, because the hammer is about to come down big-time, and the collateral damage will be huge. The Bush administration is mainly comprised of internationalists. That doesn’t mean that they “hate America”; simply that they are committed to bringing America into line with the “new world order” and an economic regime that has been approved by corporate and financial elites alike. Their patriotism extends no further than the garish tri-colored flag on their lapel. The catastrophe that middle class Americans face is what these elites breezily refer to as “shock therapy”; a sudden jolt, followed by fundamental changes to the system.

In the near future we can expect tax reform, fiscal discipline, deregulation, free capital flows, lowered tariffs, reduced public services, and privatization. In other words, a society entirely designed to service the needs of corporations. There are a number of signs that the economy is close to meltdown-stage. Even with cheap energy, low interest rates and $450 billion in borrowed revenue pumped into the system each year, the economy is still barely treading water. This has a lot to due with the colossal shifting of wealth brought on by the tax cuts. Supply-side, trickle-down theories have been widely discredited and Bush’s tax cuts have done nothing to stimulate the economy as promised. Now, with oil tilting towards $60 per barrel, the economic landscape is changing quickly, and shock-waves are already being felt throughout the country.

The Iraq war has contributed considerably to our current dilemma. The conflict has taken nearly one million barrels of Iraqi oil per day off line.(The exact amount that the administration is trying to replace by pressuring OPEC) In other words, the astronomical prices at the pump are the direct result of Bush’s war. The media has failed to report on the negative affects the war has had on oil production, just as they have obscured the incredibly successful insurgent strategy of destroying pipelines. This isn’t a storyline that plays well to the American public, who expected that Iraq would be paying for its own reconstruction by now. Instead, the resistance is striking back at the empire’s Achilles heel (America’s need for massive amounts of cheap oil) and its having a damaging affect on the US economy. Just as the economy cannot float along with sharp increases in oil prices, so too, Bush’s profligate deficits threaten the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency. This is much more serious than a simple decline in the value of the dollar.

If the major oil producers convert from the dollar to the euro, the American economy will sink almost overnight. If oil is traded in euros then central banks around the world would be compelled to follow and America will be required to pay off its enormous $8 trillion debt. That, of course, would be doomsday for the American economy. But, a recent report indicates that two-thirds of the world’s 65 central banks have already “begun to move from dollars to euros.” The Bush plan to savage the dollar has been telegraphed around the world and, as the New York Times says, “the greenback has nowhere to go but down”. There’s only one thing that the administration can do to ensure that energy dealers keep trading in dollars….control the flow of oil. That means that an attack on Iran is nearly a certainty.

The difficulties facing both the dollar and the economy are not insurmountable. The world has been more than willing to compensate for America’s wasteful spending as long as America shows itself to be a responsible steward of the global economy. However, the administration’s military and economic recklessness suggests that some of the key players on the world stage (particularly Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Germany, France, China, Brazil) are collaborating on an alternate plan; a contingency plan. If Iran is bombed in an unprovoked act of aggression, we will certainly see this plan activated. The most likely scenario would be a quick switch to the euro that would have grave implications for the American economy. (Russia has already indicated that it will do this) For Iran, an attack would justify arming disparate terrorist organizations with the weaponry they need to attack American and Israeli interests wherever they may be. In any event, an unprovoked attack will dispel the remaining illusions about Bush’s war against terror and confirm to everyone that we are engaged in a new world war; a conflict for global domination.

Tough Years Ahead

The neoliberal chickens have come home to roost. America has become the latest staging ground for the eccentric economic policies of the Washington Consensus. The towering national debt coupled with the staggering trade deficits have put the nation on a precipice and a seismic shift in the fortunes of middle-class Americans is looking more likely all the time. The New York Times summarized the country’s prospects like this: “The economic repercussions could unfold gradually, resulting in a long, slow decline in living standards. Or there could be a quick unraveling, with the hallmarks of an uncontrolled fiscal crisis.”

“An uncontrolled fiscal crisis;” America’s future under George Bush. We are facing years of collective struggle ahead. If there’s a quick fix, I have no idea what it might be.

<a href="http://www.aljazeerah.info/9o/The%20US%20Economic%20Tsunami" target="_blank">http://www.aljazeerah.info/9o/The%20US%20Economic%20Tsunami</a>,%20Sooner%20Than%20You%20Think%20By%20Mike%20Whit ney.htm

hfsc_peace
10th April 2005, 03:03 AM
Much has been made of his balance of payments and 'debt'

Who owes what, and to whom?

If we are buying Mercedes like crazy and this money is shown as a balance of payments outbound deficit, how does this affect how long Johnny is deployed in Mosul?

Any takers?

After all, not only are Mercedes now produced in Tennessee (as are toyotas), but in fact every single one is actually partly Chrysler, where the cash flows back in. These kinds of examples are manifest in every slice of industry AND service.

Will it affect our economy?

Let's take two other GIANTS with positive 'balance of payments' accounts balances and Germany and Japan. The former suffers from unemployment I beleive in the 12-15% range(anyone know ours?), and the latter has had morubund economic growth for 2 decades.

China is now touted as holding some whip hand over america in terms of balance of payments. But if they invade Taiwan and we respond, how long can THEY go without american consumers' hard dollars? WHat will they do, sell the treasury bonds and make our exports so cheap they can compete with them? Devalue the dollar until american workers pay here tranlsates into costs competitive with tech support people in Bangalore?

So what do we owe? Who is we? And to whom?

Sorry, but this is the wishful thinking of the orwellian america haters on parade.

The american economy remains the strongest because of the american consumer, who is the most productive worker, putting in the most hours on the planet, with the least vacation because we have the most to gain, the most promise ahead in our own vision. Any other nation which frees it's people to a classless future where economic security becomes possible as a vision will reap similar rewards. It ends up meaning this - WE LIKE OUR WORK. It is that resource which is the driving force of economies, not the false idea of a balance of payments account amongst international corporations whose balance sheets wouldn't even have nations ON THEM if different nations didn't have different tax requirements.

Muhammad
11th April 2005, 01:40 AM
It seems that you are not aware of all the noise of the world about your economy.

Perhaps this type of news is scarce in the USA. You know the reason I suppose.

copdot
11th April 2005, 04:56 AM
Hfsc,

I read and re read what you wrote but it didnt still convince me that the US economy is not in problems. Why is it that you would like to dig your head in the sand and pretend everythings ok because you think its patriotic to do so.

The dollar is weak, oil prices are high, dubya has done nothin to reduce unemployment and is after the Alaskan region to dig oil and screw up the enviornment, China and India and Europe are flexing their economic muscles ....

Its not going to last very long you know.

yoda
11th April 2005, 07:12 AM
When it hits, it'll hit hard, and the poor people are going to suffer.



<font color="blue">Please address the topic only. Thank you. <!--color-->[/color]

yoda
11th April 2005, 07:15 AM
Maybe some lack compassion for the poor.

Maybe some minds are only programmed to think one way - if it's 'worth it' to kill a few hundred thousand Iraqis, to make the world safer for 'himself' then surely it's 'worth it' millions of Americans 'suffer' economically, to allow a FEW to get more control of the money.





..

iqbalghani
11th April 2005, 11:20 PM
<blockquote><font class="small"><hr />
<b><i>hfsc_peace said:</i></b>

If we are buying Mercedes like crazy and this money is shown as a balance of payments outbound deficit, how does this affect how long Johnny is deployed in Mosul?



Any takers?



<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">



Balance of payments outbound deficit simply means a debt that someone, somewhere, some day would have to repay. After all, uninterrupted printing of the greenback isn't going to hold on for ever.



Johny in Mosul doesn't know about that but it is he who is there to ensure that there is something left to pay out from. OR alternatively, Johny ensures that there are other places where he can move to if there is too much pressure to cough up the debt.



But then poor Johny doesn't even know really why he is in Mosul in the first place. Poor, poor Johny! If only he knew that he is fighting someone else's war out there.

Jihad4peace
12th April 2005, 10:28 AM
Thanks for the concern Muhammad. Your compassion almost equals your sincerity.



When I get evicted can I come live with you?





<font color="orange"> Stick to the topic please <!--color-->[/color]