PDA

View Full Version : Israel. warned of London Bombing..!!!


Calkoon
8th July 2005, 09:30 AM
Why only Israel?



<b>Netanyahu Changed Plans Due to Warning </b>



JERUSALEM - British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.





Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had planned to attend an economic conference in a hotel over the subway stop where one of the blasts occurred, and the warning prompted him to stay in his hotel room instead, government officials said.



Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom said he wasn't aware of any Israeli casualties.



Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference.



<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050707/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_britain_explosions_1" target="_blank">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050707/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_britain_explosions_1</a>

Balle_Klorin
8th July 2005, 10:30 AM
How do you know only Israel was warned?

Wizard
8th July 2005, 10:51 AM
The reason is
a. Israel is a very popular target for terrorist attacks, unlike
switzerland so when there are warnings about such attacks Israel
is warned.

b. Israel is more paranoidic and always ask nearby intellegence
embassies if there is a reason to be warned.

c. Be creative, I know you can think of a concpiracy.

Calkoon
8th July 2005, 11:28 AM
How do I now only Israel... I'm quoting a report..! kindly write to the editor for further details.





And now the cover-up starts.....! Something very fishing is happening here... this happened 30 minutes ago...



<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4659331.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4659331.stm</a>



1940PM The UK foreign secretary, Jack Straw, says the London attacks bear all the hallmarks of al-Qaeda. Mr Straw, who has temporarily taken over as chairman of the G8 summit in Scotland, said <b>neither the British police nor the intelligence services had any warning of the attacks. </b>



<img src="http://www.omanforum.com/threads/images/graemlins/anim_headscratch.gif" alt="" />



<!--color-->[/color]

Did the Zionist moles embeded within the British intelligence agencies inform Israel, before (or instead of) the British leadership and people..? <font color="red">

Calkoon
8th July 2005, 01:14 PM
Another report that Israel was warned before the attack:

<a href="http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=85346" target="_blank">http://www.israelnationalnews.com/</a>

<b>
Report: Israel Was Warned Ahead of First Blast </b>
13:30 Jul 07


(IsraelNN.com) Army Radio quoting unconfirmed reliable sources reported a short time ago that Scotland Yard had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred.

The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit.

At present, train and bus service in London have been suspended following the series of attacks. No terrorist organization has claimed responsibility at this time.

Israeli officials stress the advanced Scotland Yard warning does not in any way indicate Israel was the target in the series of apparent terror attacks.

lipzickle
8th July 2005, 03:46 PM
calkoon, this same report was posted earlier - <a href="http://www.omanforum.com/threads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/237613/an/0/page/0#237613" target="_blank">here</a>

however, there is another claim that israel was not forewarned....

Israel was not warned about possible terror attacks in London before at least six blasts ripped through the city, Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom said today.

A Foreign Ministry official had said earlier that British police warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terror attacks minutes before the first explosion.

“There was no early information about terrorist attacks,” Shalom told Israel Army Radio. “After the first explosion an order was given that no one move until things become clear.”

<a href="http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/story.asp?j=122106240p=yzzyx68zx" target="_blank">full story</a>

and

Israel Warned United Kingdom About Possible Attacks

07/07/05 "Stratfor Consulting Intelligence Agency"

Summary

There has been massive confusion over a denial made by the Israelis that the Scotland Yard had warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terrorist attacks “minutes before” the first bomb went off July 7. Israel warned London of the attacks a “couple of days ago,” but British authorities failed to respond accordingly to deter the attacks, according to an unconfirmed rumor circulating in intelligence circles. While Israel is keeping quiet for the time-being, British Prime Minister Tony Blair soon will be facing the heat for his failure to take action.

Analysis

The Associated Press reported July 7 that an anonymous source in the Israeli Foreign Ministry said Scotland Yard had warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terrorist attacks in the U.K. capital. The information reportedly was passed to the embassy minutes before the first bomb struck at 0851 London time. The Israeli Embassy promptly ordered Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to remain in his hotel on the morning of July 7. Netanyahu was scheduled to participate in an Israeli Investment Forum Conference at the Grand Eastern Hotel, located next to the Liverpool Street Tube station -- the first target in the series of bombings that hit London on July 7.

Several hours later, Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom officially denied reports that Scotland Yard passed any information to Israel regarding the bombings, and British police denied they had any advanced warning of the attacks. The British authorities similarly denied that any information exchange had occurred.

Contrary to original claims that Israel was warned “minutes before” the first attack, unconfirmed rumors in intelligence circles indicate that the Israeli government actually warned London of the attacks “a couple of days” previous. Israel has apparently given other warnings about possible attacks that turned out to be aborted operations. The British government did not want to disrupt the G-8 summit in Gleneagles, Scotland, or call off visits by foreign dignitaries to London, hoping this would be another false alarm.

<font color="blue">The British government sat on this information for days and failed to respond. <!--color-->[/color]Though the Israeli government is playing along publicly, it may not stay quiet for long. This is sure to apply pressure on Blair very soon for his failure to deter this major terrorist attack.
<a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9412.htm" target="_blank">source</a>

conspiracy theories? cover up?

difficult to say at this stage. or perhaps any stage <img src="http://www.omanforum.com/threads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" />

8th July 2005, 06:51 PM
I guess its not just a conspiracy theory this time huh? I'll put my life savings on that no American network will give this story the required coverage.

wildrose
8th July 2005, 06:57 PM
What is the required coverage?

WR

Balle_Klorin
9th July 2005, 01:35 AM
<blockquote><font class="small"><hr />
<b><i>Calkoon said:</i></b>
How do I now only Israel... I'm quoting a report..! kindly write to the editor for further details.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

No, you are not. You are making a statement. The report says Israel was warned, it does not say only Israel was warned.

So, how do you know only Israel was warned?

allahdas
9th July 2005, 06:09 AM
Possibly "Mossad" is behind this acts.

Jihad4peace
9th July 2005, 08:40 AM
Hey look,

Here's another example of Arabs blaming Jews and the CIA for when Muslims blow up Westerners.

I would think you would rather just remain silent than bring even more attention to it. Especially when it only adds insult to the injury.

The first step is admitting you have a problem.

Calkoon
9th July 2005, 09:47 AM
Jihad4peace, the reports appeared on Jewish and American sites......



<b>

Why the cover up.....??

</b>



Let's be clear here, A-Qaida has not claimed responsibility, but it bears their signature. I'll tell you what else, how did that "fake" Al-Qaida warning appear in newspapers so quickly..?!? All Western newspapers accepted its genuinity without reservations.



Personally, I think it's very likely the insurgents from Iraq who organised these bombings.





Balle_Klorin, we'll have to wait for other nations to mention if they were warned...! How else will I know? Considering they are now claiming, there was NO warning and Israel is now denying they were warned..... That's obviously not going to happen. An answer to your question is moot.....



I can however make a very good assumption as to why only Israel recieved a warning (if such a warning was issued). Israel has spies embedded within the British intelligence. This is how Zionists work. These's no such thing as a British Jew... there are only Jews in Britian. And some of these Jews serve the Zionists State unreservedly.





Claiming they recieved a warning exposes the spy.



The British on the other hand will not dare admit they had a warning, because it'll cause problems for the Government.

allahdas
9th July 2005, 10:02 AM
Every terrorist acts in west benefited by Israel ( not Jews) . Enmity between West & Islam to keep alive is a State policy of Israel.

Who is this "Islamic" terrorists ?. Muslim organizations of extreme views are inflitrated by Mossad & CIA agents. They supply all means to destalize the regions.

see the example on web site <a href="http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MOR505A.html" target="_blank">http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MOR505A.html</a>

Balle_Klorin
9th July 2005, 11:17 AM
<blockquote><font class="small"><hr />
<b><i>Calkoon said:</i></b>
Jihad4peace, the reports appeared on Jewish and American sites......

<b>
Why the cover up.....??
</b>

Let's be clear here, A-Qaida has not claimed responsibility, but it bears their signature. I'll tell you what else, how did that "fake" Al-Qaida warning appear in newspapers so quickly..?!? All Western newspapers accepted its genuinity without reservations.

Personally, I think it's very likely the insurgents from Iraq who organised these bombings.


Balle_Klorin, we'll have to wait for other nations to mention if they were warned...! How else will I know? Considering they are now claiming, there was NO warning and Israel is now denying they were warned..... That's obviously not going to happen. An answer to your question is moot.....

I can however make a very good assumption as to why only Israel recieved a warning (if such a warning was issued). Israel has spies embedded within the British intelligence. This is how Zionists work. These's no such thing as a British Jew... there are only Jews in Britian. And some of these Jews serve the Zionists State unreservedly.


Claiming they recieved a warning exposes the spy.

The British on the other hand will not dare admit they had a warning, because it'll cause problems for the Government.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


How else you WILL know? Maybe you should find out the facts before you post? Or maybe use a different angle?

Jihad4peace
9th July 2005, 11:21 AM
<blockquote><font class="small"><hr />
<b><i>Adas4 said:</i></b>
Enmity between West & Islam to keep alive is a State policy of Israel.


<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Does Osama bin Laden know this?

Calkoon
9th July 2005, 11:28 AM
It's very clear from Israel actions and control in the US, that it wants to keep alive the enimity between West and Muslims. It serves Israel and justifies it's crimes against the Palestinians...



<blockquote><font class="small"><hr />


How else you WILL know? Maybe you should find out the facts before you post? Or maybe use a different angle?



<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">



The facts are clearly mentioned in the articles "written" by Jewish and American websites.



Netanyahu was informed of the bombs before they occured. A FACT....





It's not an Arab conspiracy theory...... I'm using the right angel, I'm quoting several Western sources... Absolutely no body else has claimed they too were informed of the bombings before it happened .....

BlueDiamond
9th July 2005, 02:12 PM
<font color="purple">Off topic.

Blue Diamond,

Please don't insult the members.

Thank you. <!--color-->[/color]

Calkoon
9th July 2005, 03:27 PM
What other conclusion can one reach when you look at what's happening in Palestine???

The US Admin always completely ignores the brutal and inhumane actions by Israel... why?? How can such actions be justified??

Since you are educated BlueDiamond and full of knowledge, kindly explain why the US blindly and unreservedly supports Israel, regardless of the actions these zionists take?

Or does your education teach you to turn a blind eye and keep it shut..!

Jesus_Mohammed
9th July 2005, 05:02 PM
#237898 - 07/08/05 10:47 PM: "All Western newspapers accepted its genuinity without reservations."

Did you read all of them? Wow! I first read it on BBC Worldservice and they qualified the statement by saying that authenticity was very hard to determine so soon without further investigation.


#237898 - 07/08/05 10:47 PM: "Israel has spies embedded within the British intelligence. This is how Zionists work. These's no such thing as a British Jew... there are only Jews in Britian. And some of these Jews serve the Zionists State unreservedly."

All countries have spies in other countries YOUR country has spies in other countries. It just so happens that Israel has one of the best intelligence networks in the world.

On the other hand, your discourse is reminicent of the xenophobic scares perpetuated by the rise of Fascism in the 1930s. Heil Hitler!


#237915 - 07/09/05 12:28 AM: "The facts are clearly mentioned in the articles "written" by Jewish and American websites."

Do websites write or do people write and post on websites? Hmm. And I don't know why "written" is in quotation marks. Is there a question as to whether writing has happened or not?


#237976 - 07/09/05 04:27 AM: "The US Admin always completely ignores the brutal and inhumane actions by Israel."

"Always completely" is historically wrong. Bush II has given more unqualified support than any US Administration EVER.


#237976 - 07/09/05 04:27 AM: "kindly explain why the US blindly and unreservedly supports Israel, regardless of the actions these zionists take?"

However you feel about it, the State of Israel is a political and cultural ally of the US. They are what is called "strategically important." They are not the first country whom the US has turned a blind eye to. When Iraq was a US ally they turned blind eye to Saddam Hussien's atrocities -- arguably far worse than Israel's. The US seldom if ever criticizes it allies in the Gulf.


"04:27 AM"? Don't you have to get up and go to work in the morning? Don't you work for a living? Have a real job? Get some sleep, bro.


"Education"? C'mon. Public education in the Midle East is shameful. Yes, I know, it is "developing."

Calkoon
12th July 2005, 08:24 AM
Finally the truth is exposed.... It was all a zionist lie..!! and propaganda....

<a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9412.htm" target="_blank">http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9412.htm</a>
<b>
Israel Warned United Kingdom About Possible Attacks</b>

07/07/05 "Stratfor Consulting Intelligence Agency"
<b>
Summary</b>

There has been massive confusion over a denial made by the Israelis that the Scotland Yard had warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terrorist attacks “minutes before” the first bomb went off July 7. Israel warned London of the attacks a “couple of days ago,” but British authorities failed to respond accordingly to deter the attacks, according to an unconfirmed rumor circulating in intelligence circles. While Israel is keeping quiet for the time-being, British Prime Minister Tony Blair soon will be facing the heat for his failure to take action.
<b>
Analysis</b>

The Associated Press reported July 7 that an anonymous source in the Israeli Foreign Ministry said Scotland Yard had warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terrorist attacks in the U.K. capital. The information reportedly was passed to the embassy minutes before the first bomb struck at 0851 London time. The Israeli Embassy promptly ordered Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to remain in his hotel on the morning of July 7. Netanyahu was scheduled to participate in an Israeli Investment Forum Conference at the Grand Eastern Hotel, located next to the Liverpool Street Tube station -- the first target in the series of bombings that hit London on July 7.

Several hours later, Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom officially denied reports that Scotland Yard passed any information to Israel regarding the bombings, and British police denied they had any advanced warning of the attacks. The British authorities similarly denied that any information exchange had occurred.

Contrary to original claims that Israel was warned “minutes before” the first attack, unconfirmed rumors in intelligence circles indicate that the Israeli government actually warned London of the attacks “a couple of days” previous. Israel has apparently given other warnings about possible attacks that turned out to be aborted operations. The British government did not want to disrupt the G-8 summit in Gleneagles, Scotland, or call off visits by foreign dignitaries to London, hoping this would be another false alarm.

The British government sat on this information for days and failed to respond. Though the Israeli government is playing along publicly, it may not stay quiet for long. This is sure to apply pressure on Blair very soon for his failure to deter this major terrorist attack.

kathaksung
14th July 2005, 12:04 PM
327. London bombing (7/12/05)

I think it was the work of D.O.J.

In my case, for many times Feds had tried to carry out terror attacks to control the situation. The evident ones since last year:

#1. In April plot of 2004, on 4/21(?) Robert Mueller announced that Hongkong was the target of Al Qaida. See "223. FBI director said HongKong will be attacked (4/24/04)"

#2. In June plot of 2004, on 5/26 Ashcroft and Mueller announced US would be attacked by Al Qaida this summer. See "232. Terror attack and distraction (6/4/04)".

#3. In July plot of 2004, on 7/8 Tom Ridge said there would be a large scale of Al Qaida attack before November election. See "240. Cover up (7/14)"

#4. On 8/1/04, to intimidate financial group about raising interest rate, Tom Ridge raised alarm code in certain financial area to orange color. Said Al Qaida target this area. See "251. Mortgage rate and September plot (8/29)"

#5. In October plot of 2004, on 9/17 FBI issued an "Anti-Terror 'October Plan'". See "257. Beware of another terror attack (9/29)" and "258. Another attempt to frame a case (10/4)"

#6. In January plot of 2005, FBI said on 1/20 that there was a "Boston dirty bomb" case. See "284. Aggressive FBI (1/24/05)".

One thing interesting was how my revelation changed the warning method of D.O.J. Have you noticed that in #1. and #2. the terror alert was issued by FBI and D.O.J.? Then in #3. and #4. Tom Ridge replaced the role of FBI. Why? If you noticed in #2, I wrote,(quote from 232) "Under the Homeland Security Act of 2002, only the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can publicly issue such threat warnings. What made D.O.J. neglect DHS? "

It was a swift response from Feds. They cover up their flaw by letting Tom Ridge to do the work for them. Ridge was only a puppet in these cases. But Feds felt uncomfortable to let "outsider"(Tom Ridge) to involve in their criminal case. So there after there was no terror alarm anymore. #5 and #6 were only plan and case of FBI.

All the above six "terror attack" cases related to the framed cases applied on me in timing. The plotter is no other but Feds - D.O.J. and FBI. The framed case soured under my revelation. None of the above "terror attacks" was proved true.

Out of these six "terrorist cases", you can see five were accused of "Al Qaida", only #6 was accused of "Iraqi and Chinese". How convenient it is to attribute everything to "Al Qaida". That is why we can never find Bin Laden or Al Zhaqawi. They are so important chips in "Extortion war on people" for Bush and inside group.

In recent months, framed case came one after another, the latest one ended on 7/1. What is the next? I wondered.

In early July, London won the host of 2012 Olympic Games. The Olympic Game is a profitable business. It will benefit the economy of hosting country. I had experience that it was used as a chip in secret deal. (China was rewarded 2008 Olympic as a payment in secret deal with FBI and DEA in 2001. See "77. The payment of deal (July 2002)") So when I heard this news, I wondered if it was another secret deal? It was.

Next day, London bombing solved my puzzle. London suffered a terror attack(in the name of Al Qaida) but got a compensation in economy.

It also solved my puzzle that a terror attack will be used to distract in next framed case. London bombing will justify the next "terror attack" in US. Pre-psychological propaganda is an important tactic Feds used in their plot. So they always issued an alert to a plot to en-believe the public that it was real from enemy. But the previous "case" were all soured which brought them embarrassment. Such like that their "most wanted" was proved to be in jail already. Or the case was a "hoax". Or the plot was from their own informant. This time they bought a big one: "London bombing". With which, feds silently got what they want: an "orange" code in home security without public notice.

(To be continued)

Dark Angel
14th July 2005, 05:57 PM
No! It was the work of McDonalds!! IT WAS!!!

Jesus_Mohammed
14th July 2005, 09:21 PM
So, Calkoon, who were the bombers?



<font color="red">

Topic name: "Israel. warned of London Bombing..!!!"



start up a new thrad called: Who were the bombers <!--color-->[/color]