What new trick will the United States & Britain play for attacking Iraq

[Mujahid]

1. Secretly threaten or bribe the weapons inspectors to produce their next report in favor of the US stand.

2. Agree to share the Iraqi booty after war with France and Russia in exchange of supporting the US in security council

3. Plant false evidence of WMD in Iraq

4. Shoot down their own planes and kill a few of their own men to provide an excuse.

5. Blow up their own buildings and plant evidence of Iraq-Alqaida link.

6. Just go and attack Iraq like a belligerant bully ignoring all pleas and reasons.

[hfsc_peace]

You have very neatly layed a perfect circle of logic encompassing almost all situations so that all objective evidence can be nullified in your mind. This way the world of fantasy may remain intact.

Pray that the republican guard does not loose VX in the environs of Baghdad.

Pray

[Brasco]

"Pray that the republican guard does not loose VX in the environs of Baghdad.

Pray"

The US definitely needs to be disarmed.
************************************************** **********

[Dragon]

<b>The US definitely needs to be disarmed.</b>

This is for sure and Israel as well, the US was the only State who developed Nukes, used them and still threatening to use them. Disarming them, indeed will secure the international peace forever. But this matter looks, unfortunately, as a faraway dream, how could it be achieved, when the biggest arsenal of WMD in the hands of people who are willing to use them, and no one's out there to stop them? <img src="/threads/images/graemlins/ooo.gif" alt="" />

[mutant]

You said it Bras.. And you always say it. There should be one rule of law for all thre countries of the world. Not that Iraq be threatened for having WMD Israel America have hundreds of thousands of them all stockpiled ready to be used no one talking about them. The Americans should practice what they preach. Let them first get rid of the weapons they have themselves. We can worry about Saddam afterwards.

[hfsc_peace]

Please explain why US use of nukes in WW2 was bad

[hfsc_peace]

It is an interesting connection

[old_n_grumpy]

hfsc peace,
It's an all fronts assault by the blame layers.

[Calkoon]

I';ll go wiith 6



* Just go and attack Iraq like a belligerent bully ignoring all pleas and reasons.





I think the US will hold on to small issues and blow them out of proportions to justify their attack on Iraq. Both Tony Blair and Bush have shown us very clearly what their true justification is, "they will not wait until Saddam starts to THINK of attacking the US" or "before he THINKS of giving WMD to terrorist.



Ironically North Korea supplies missile technology and is developing nukes, yet their actions do not warrant a War....!



The reason there is NO reason to go to war is because they are not telling us the REAL reason. I've said this for a very long time and I still stand by it, the US is fighting Israels war.... Iraq poses absolutely no threat on America. Israel is the only country that is threatened by Iraq.



Once Iraq has ended expect the US to turn their attention to Iran. As far as North Korea is concerned, the US is pushing North Korea towards an imminent war that I think will include nukes. The US has sown the seeds for a catastrophe, I honestly cannot see a return on that front, especially with the current US admin.

[old_n_grumpy]

I'm glad someone finally explained the situation to me. Now that I know that the US vs Iraq is just one belligerent bully taking on another belligerent bully I'll stop worrying about it. We'd all be a lot better off without any bullies.

[hfsc_peace]

<a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2cid=578u=/nm/20030217/ts_nm/korea_north_dcprinter=1" target="_blank">http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2cid=578u=/nm/20030217/ts_nm/korea_north_dcprinter=1</a>

<a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2cid=574u=/nm/20030217/wl_nm/arms_japan_missile_dc_1printer=1" target="_blank">http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2cid=574u=/nm/20030217/wl_nm/arms_japan_missile_dc_1printer=1</a>

Put this together with Japan's decree last Fri that they regarded PRE-EMPTIVE attack on North Korea as a valid solution ...

So sorry, this picture is (IMHO) just as dangerous if not WORSE than Iraq.

Japan, SK, nuclear powers in SHORT ORDER.
BAD ALL BAD

But US forces are just not made to conquer the world (as I know many of you believe, and WISH to believe) so I don't think we can take on the million + army of NK and Iraq in the SAME way at the SAME time.

But rather than see 5-10 more nuclear powers with hair triggers around an NK threatening EVERY DAY (now) to take out the west coast, and SELLING PLUTONIUM FOR $$ along with MISSILES, I think getting that 61 year old cretin out of Pyongyang sounds like a lot fewer lives lost. We take them at their word.

[Mujahid]

If the US starts the war on either Iraq or NK it will be fighting with both because there is definitely some secret treaty between the two countries, there will be definitely some exchange of arms and while one engages the US the other will attack and beat the US. Dubya and his hoodlums will find they have bitten off a lot more than they could chew.

[MoonBeam]

Muji! Wake up! You're STILL having a bad dream! <img src="/threads/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

[hfsc_peace]

and these gavones will then have proved EVERY WORD BUSH SAYS IS RIGHT, which, since we can read, is EXACTLY WHAT YOU BELIEVE. That Bush is correct and the axis of evil exists.

If so, we will deal with them in a rather HOT way, and every democratic ally will be on board.

Don't you understand this?

You don't do you?
You don't get it.