PDA

View Full Version : Blix Blasts P(B)entagon


fazli
11th June 2003, 07:44 PM
Blix stung by 'Pentagon smear'

<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2980332.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2980332.stm</a>

The UN chief weapons inspector, Hans Blix, has lashed out at the US Defence Department, saying some "bastards" in Washington tried to undermine him in the run-up to the Iraq war.

In an interview with the UK's Guardian newspaper, Mr Blix said there were US officials who had "spread things around, of course, who planted nasty things in the media".
"It was like a mosquito bite in the evening that is there in the morning, an irritant," he said.

According to Mr Blix, as the US build-up for an invasion of Iraq intensified, US administration officials had leaned on his weapons inspectors to use more damning language in their reports on Iraq.

The UN inspectors searched more than 200 sites over three-and-a-half months but failed to find any weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

But the US-led coalition insisted there were weapons to be found. Its failure to find any WMD in Iraq to date has triggered a storm of criticism about the issue, which was the main US and UK justification for the war.

Mr Blix said that, despite the actions of his "detractors" in Washington, "by and large, my relations with the US were good".

However, he said Washington now viewed the United Nations as an "alien power".
"There are people in this [US] administration who say they don't care if the UN sinks under the East river, and other crude things."

Mr Blix's deputy Dimitri Perricos, a veteran UN arms expert, has been named to replace him as head of the UN Monitoring, Inspection and Verification Commission (Unmovic).
Mr Blix is retiring after more than three years as UN chief weapons inspector.
Last week Mr Blix criticised the quality of the US and UK intelligence given to him on alleged Iraqi WMD, saying his inspectors had found nothing after acting on tip-offs.
In his last report to the UN Security Council, he recorded an open verdict over whether Iraq had WMD.

Saddam Hussein's regime might have hidden weapons, or it might have destroyed them, Mr Blix said................

12th June 2003, 06:06 AM
Lets hope the American public will wake up and rise against its government. Whos evil now?

Animal
12th June 2003, 06:24 AM
Yes, but fazli

WMD or no WMD Saddam was a bad guy (a guy no one on earth knows the whereabouts) and we smoked him out. The US is a lot safer now wouldn't you agree?

12th June 2003, 06:25 AM
are you being sarcastic?

Animal
12th June 2003, 06:26 AM
What do you think? With the sort of replys we get from some esteemed members of this forum how could one not be sarcastic?

12th June 2003, 06:46 AM
You really think America is more secure now that Saddam is gone?

SilverSurfer
12th June 2003, 08:05 AM
<blockquote><font class="small"><hr />
Lets hope the American public will wake up and rise against its government. Whos evil now?


<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Don't hold your breath. We like our government.

tomdz
12th June 2003, 06:37 PM
America is not going to safer place as long as they continue dirty foreign policies. Americans are never feel safe in any part of the world

America created Osama, Taliban, Mujahudeens and Terrorists for their own dirty intersts.

America given chemical and bio wepons to Sadam.

America is getting back what they paid for.

fazli
12th June 2003, 08:12 PM
Nobody will disagree that getting rid of Saddam was a good thing. However there was surely a much better way of doing it than the one the Yanks chose unless of course they didnt know how and nobody had the courage to tell them so....

shamsery
13th June 2003, 12:17 AM
The war was not at all for WMD.